+1 to lazine Ahmad
On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:53 AM, John Burwell <jburw...@basho.com> wrote: > +1 to the proposal and lazy consensus > > On Jun 25, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 01:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers >>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>>> +1 - reasonable plan. I'm not sure we need a "vote" though. Let's >>>> use lazy consensus on this one. >>>> >>>> Folks - you can see the plan. Shout if you disagree in any way. >>> >>> Agreed with lazy consensus for the move. >>> I would like some explicit reviews of the repo. >>> I'd really like to get this writable and a release generated. >> >> +1 to lazy consensus. (oh, wait...) >> >> Best, >> >> jzb >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier >> j...@zonker.net >> Twitter: @jzb >> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
