What I did was follow Edison's default plug-in as a template and used the
inject method to link in my life cycle and driver instances.

    @Override

    public boolean configure(Map<String, Object> params) {

        lifecycle =
ComponentContext.inject(SolidFirePrimaryDataStoreLifeCycle.class);

        driver = ComponentContext.inject(SolidfirePrimaryDataStoreDriver.
class);

        listener = ComponentContext.inject(new HypervisorHostListener() {

            public boolean hostConnect(long hostId, long poolId) {

                return true;

            }


            public boolean hostDisconnected(long hostId, long poolId) {

                return true;

            }

        });


        return true;

    }


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Oh, I see...that's a good question.
>
> I'll have to defer that one to Edison.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Understood, I've done that. But I was wondering if there was a generic
>> way to group all components (driver, lifecycle, provider) of a
>> vendor-implementation into a logical spring context like say:
>>
>> In componentContext.xml.in
>>
>> <!-- Networking adapters -->
>>   <bean id="ipDeployers" class="com.cloud.utils.component.AdapterList">
>>     <property name="Adapters">
>>       <list>
>>           <ref bean="elasticLoadBalancerElement"/>
>>           <ref bean="VirtualRouter"/>
>>           <ref bean="VpcVirtualRouter"/>
>>           <ref bean="NiciraNvp"/>
>>           <ref bean="InternalLbVm"/>
>>       </list>
>>     </property>
>>   </bean>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:19:40AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Yeah, John Burwell is finishing up the review process for the SolidFire
>> > plug-in, so - at present - the code is not in master.
>> >
>> > To try to answer your question, I had to modify the
>> > applicationContext.xml.in file.
>> >
>> > Here is the line I added:
>> >
>> > <bean id="solidFireDataStoreProvider"
>> >
>> class="org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.provider.SolidfirePrimaryDataStoreProvider"
>> > />
>> >
>> > Talk to you later!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I noticed that all the storage providers are plugged in via
>> > > applicationContext by default. How does one plugin a custom provider -
>> > > say for example CompanyXStorageProvider?
>> > >
>> > > On looking at the SolidFire implementation I found the plugin doesn't
>> > > actually come into play when running in either OSS or nonOSS mode.
>> > > IOW, the plugin isn't injected in either of - componentContext.xml.in
>> > > / nonossComponentContext.xml.in. Is the merge still in progress?
>> > >
>> > > Since these are not 'Adapters' so I don't know how to plugin my own
>> > > storage provider into the contexts - oss/non-oss. Unlike network
>> > > elements the DataStoreProvider, DataStoreLifeCycle seem independant
>> and
>> > > don't follow the plugin model. How does this work?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Prasanna.,
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------
>> > > Powered by BigRock.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > *?*
>>
>> --
>> Prasanna.,
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Powered by BigRock.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to