-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review21993
-----------------------------------------------------------


Commit a2c7d3a8a75b2cec266cef566b8828be7a1ebc72 in branch refs/heads/master 
from Jessica Wang
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a2c7d3a ]

CLOUDSTACK-869: Add VPC dialog - add Public LB Provider dropdown, remove VPC 
Offering dropdown. When Public LB Provider is selected as Netscaler, pass 
"Default VPC offering with Netscaler" to createVPC API. When Public LB Provider 
is selected as VpcVirtualRouter, pass "Default VPC Offering" to createVPC API.


- ASF Subversion and Git Services


On May 8, 2013, 1:39 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2013, 1:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala, Murali Reddy, Alena 
> Prokharchyk, Vijay Venkatachalam, and Ram Ganesh.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This feature will introduce Netscaler as external LB provider in VPC.
> As of now only 1 tier is support for external LB.
> A new VPC offering will be created "Default VPC Offering with NS" with all 
> the services provided by VPCVR and LB service with NetScaler.
> Existing NetscalerElement is used and implements VpcProvider.
> In VpcManager, Netscaler is added as one of the supported providers.
> Netscaler will be dedicated to the vpc.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   api/src/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcOffering.java 3961d0a 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
>  7bd9c2e 
>   server/pom.xml 808dd3e 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 5e8be92 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/guru/ExternalGuestNetworkGuru.java b1606db 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcManagerImpl.java a7f06e9 
>   server/test/com/cloud/vpc/VpcTest.java PRE-CREATION 
>   
> server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/networkoffering/CreateNetworkOfferingTest.java
>  cbb6c00 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual Testing:
> ==============
> 1. Creation of Vpc with the default offering with NS is created successfully. 
> ( Enable Netscaler provider in network service providers)
> 2. Deletion of Vpc with the default offering with NS is deleted successfully.
> 3. Creation of new Vpc Network Offering with Netscaler as LB provider with 
> dedicated mode is created successfully.
> 4. Creation of new Vpc Network Offering with Netscaler as LB provider with 
> shared mode should throw exception.
> 5. Creation of tier (webtier) with the created Vpcnetscaler offering is 
> created successfully.
> 6. Verified Only one tier with netscaler as LB provider can be created. 
> 7. Verified deploying Instance in the tier is successful.
> 8. Verified a new nic got created with gateway ip from the tier cidr.
> 9. Verified deployed instance should get the ip from the specified tier cidr 
> range.
> 10. Acquire public ip in the vpc.
> 11. Verified creation on LB rule, is selecting only free dedicated Netscaler 
> device and necessary configuration is created and LB rule is created on NS
> 12. Deletion of LB rule is successful.
> 13. Modification of LB rule is successful
> 14. Creation of LB Health Check of TCP type is successful.
> 15. Deletion of LB Health Check of TCP type is successful.
> 16. Creation of LB Health Check of HTTP type is successful.
> 17. Deletion of LB Health Check of HTTP type is successful.
> 18. IpAssoc command is executed successful on Netscaler.
> 19. Deletion of tier will delete the tier and config on netscaler is cleared
> 20. Deletion of tier will mark the netscaler to be in free mode.
> 
> 
> Unit Test:
> ===========
> Created VpcManger tests and added few tests to createNetworkOfferingTest
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajesh Battala
> 
>

Reply via email to