> On May 31, 2013, 4:43 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > test/integration/smoke/test_zwps.py, line 127
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/diff/2/?file=297285#file297285line127>
> >
> >     This test is not required. If I deploy a zone with zone-wide storage 
> > then the regular deployVM test will be sufficient.
> 
> SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
>     Above suggestion is enough for deploy VM when there is only zone-wide 
> storage, the case  added here is a case where there are multiple primaries 
> and if you want to choose where your VM to be on ZWPS.
>     
>     For testing VM life cycle tests on different scoped(CLUSTER, ZONE, HOST) 
> primary storages, if we have a zone deployed with just that specific scoped 
> storage, I agree , just running VM life cycle would suffice.

Can I run this test on any configuration of advanced zone and NFS storage? Will 
this need to have a zone-wide primary storage added to work?


- Prasanna


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/#review21227
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 28, 2013, 3:24 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 28, 2013, 3:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added few basic zone wide primary storage tests.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2710.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 598654d 
>   test/integration/smoke/test_zwps.py PRE-CREATION 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py ec1c34e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> done.
> teardown() fails as there is a bug while moving a storagepool into 
> maintenance.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
> 
>

Reply via email to