Reading through this and seeing Chiradeep's passionate comments here and reasoning. I'Ll go from -1 to +1 on this. Especially since we will see this in 4.2.
I still think it's a bruise, but hopefully will not be a black eye. Matt On 5/22/13 10:24 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Chiradeep Vittal ><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> For those wanting to use the S3-sync for XCP/Xen, they could use the 4.2 >> template. Just like the IPV6 feature, that could be deemed experimental. > >I'm now in agreement with this. The "root issue" is now solved for >KVM and VMware users in 4.1. We have also resolved the root cause in >the new system VM templates. We can provide instructions for using >the new system VM templates within the documentation prior to >releasing 4.1, and highlight that required step if using S3. > >I'm +1 on moving forward (although I started the vote, I figured I >should also cast a vote on this one).
