-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11224/#review20784
-----------------------------------------------------------



plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11224/#comment42875>

    Why ICMP's getSrcPortRange is null(then need the min/max default value)?



plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11224/#comment42876>

    I think it's wrong here. Firewall is only firewall, it won't and shouldn't 
response to the ICMP or other request, unless port forwarding or static nat 
rule configured.


- Sheng Yang


On May 20, 2013, 5:55 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11224/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 20, 2013, 5:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Sheng Yang, and Murali 
> Reddy.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 1. Updated to configure the firewall filter for the icmp protocol
> 2. Proxy arp is required for icmp response on SRX public IP. So adding proxy 
> arp along with firewall rules
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2386.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/element/JuniperSRXExternalFirewallElement.java
>  a429306 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
>  a0068c3 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/ExternalFirewallDeviceManagerImpl.java 4a90a77 
>   utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java 9551c26 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11224/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Added icmp firewall rule and tested ping to public ip from the public 
> subnet
> 2. Tested configuring Static NAT and PF
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jayapal Reddy
> 
>

Reply via email to