While we wait for feedback from Nicolas on CLOUDSTACK-2309, does anyone from Citrix (who worked on version 2.x) have any ideas why static routes defined in 2.x would be missing from a 3.x system VM (deployed by 4.1.0 management server)?
It's possible that Nicolas needed to destroy the system VM instead of stopping / restarting it, but I figured I'd ask for ideas in case there are any... -chip On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:05:45PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:34:12PM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > I've commented on 2309. I need more information. > > > > Wei > > Thanks Wei! > > I also asked for log files after retest. > > -chip > > > > > > > 2013/5/2 Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:47:49AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > > > > I've commented on 2218. > > > > > > I'm not able to reproduce it myself honestly. I think that I'll avoid > > > blocking on that without further information. > > > > > > Now... Anyone want to take on 2309? > > > > > > > > > > > Kelven > > > > > > > > On 5/2/13 11:13 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Now that the DB upgrade code is sorted out, we seem to be down to two > > > > >issues: > > > > > > > > > >CLOUDSTACK-2309 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 : network static routes > > > > >deleted on SSVM > > > > > > > > > >CLOUDSTACK-2218 - [web.context.ContextLoader] (main:null) Context > > > > >initialization failed > > > > > > > > > >Can I get two volunteers to review / fix please? > > > > > > > > > > >
