Thanks! We can continue the testing now. :)

--Sheng


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:

> commit f66b9b570f2acb35acfda2d159dcde6fa62390d5
> Author: Marcus Sorensen <mar...@betterservers.com>
> Date:   Wed Apr 10 13:27:10 2013 -0600
>
>     Send only \n rather than \r\n to agent socket when sending cmdline
>     to system VMS
>
>     BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1732
>     Signed-off-by: Marcus Sorensen <mar...@betterservers.com> 1365622030
> -0600
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> yes, you're right, I just ran into this today. The \r\n I believed was
>> necessary for the socket to flush, but apparently it isn't. If the patch is
>> in a request you can apply it.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marcus,
>>>
>>> I found this 4.2 blocker bug
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1732 caused by your
>>> commit to change the communication mechanism for KVM systemvm.
>>>
>>> As I said, I am not very familiar with python, but seems "\r\n" would
>>> generated "^M" rather than normal unix return character. I've tried
>>> following fix and it works. But I am not sure if it's the right fix,
>>> because obviously "\r\n" is more complex than "\n", so you should had
>>> reason to do so.
>>>
>>> yasker@yasker-devbox:~/develop/cloudstack-oss$ git diff
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/patchviasocket.plb/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/
>>> patchviasocket.pl
>>> index 443d6e4..7bcd245 100644
>>> --- a/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/patchviasocket.pl
>>> +++ b/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/patchviasocket.pl
>>> @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ my $msg = "pubkey:" . $key . "\ncmdline:" . $cmdline;
>>>
>>>  my $socket = IO::Socket::UNIX->new(Peer=>$sockfile,Type=>SOCK_STREAM)
>>>      or die "ERROR: unable to connect to $sockfile - $^E\n";
>>> -print $socket "$msg\r\n";
>>> +print $socket "$msg\n";
>>>  close $socket;
>>>
>>> So could you shed some lights on it?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> --Sheng
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to