Assuming we will have to disable Cisco UCS functionality as well; as that would have some dependency on Baremetal.
Is that right? CLOUDSTACK-723 Enhanced Baremetal servers support on Cisco UCS <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-723> ŠParth On 3/21/13 3:00 PM, "Jessica Wang" <jessica.w...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Animesh Chaturvedi >Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:56 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Jessica Wang >Subject: RE: [ACS41] Baremetal blockers > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:22 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Jessica Wang >> Subject: RE: [ACS41] Baremetal blockers >> >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I am checking if these can be reassigned. If it does not pan >> > >> > > out by >> > >> tomorrow I will propose to disable the feature for 4.1 release. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think that a decision is predicated on a more specific >> > >> > statement of what we mean by "disable". >> > >> >> > >> Pinging on this again. I'm leaning towards agreement, but what >> > >> *exactly* can we do to disable it and (at the same time) minimize >> > >> the >> > >> knock- on effect of the change required to disable it. >> > > [Animesh>] There is no one available to pick up these defects in >> > > time for >> > 4.1 so we will disable the feature. Disable means Baremetal will be >> > removed from componentContext.xml , the API and UI will not be >> available. >> > >> > Are you sure that removing the plugin from componentContext.xml will >> > remove it from the UI? (I'm not, that's why I'm asking) >> [Animesh>] Yes, discussed with Alex and Jessica. >[Animesh>] Will try out the change and submit a patch. Jessica anything >else? >[Jessica W] Nothing else except removing Baremetal from listHypervisors >API response and listSupportedNetworkServices API response. >
