Major should be fine as it has usability impact. Let us leave the priority as 
is. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:01 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Subject: RE: [ACS42] VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support in 
CloudStack

Sudha,

We can certainly lower the level - as its not breaking stuff. Its just initial 
addition of DVS based Vsphere cluster - will be painful - if you don't know the 
possible issues. I just don't want these issue to be dropped from the radar 
because they are deemed as "minor".

Regards
ilya



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:42 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> Subject: RE: [ACS42] VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch 
> support in CloudStack
> 
> Thanks Ilya! These are logged as Major. Do you want to keep the 
> priority as such. Hope no functionality broken significantly.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:20 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> Subject: RE: [ACS42] VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch 
> support in CloudStack
> 
> Hi Sudha and Sateesh,
> 
> Logged 2 issues:
> 
> VmWare DVS vmware.ports.per.dvportgroup setting not used
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1767
> 
> VMWare DVS - cannot use untagged portgroups
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1767
> 
> Regards
> ilya
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:43 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> > Subject: [ACS42] VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support 
> > in CloudStack
> >
> > Sateesh,
> > Can you check the comments in this story [1]. Ilya has logged couple 
> > of defects
> >
> > Ilya,
> > Can you explicitly log the defects so that Sateesh can fix those
> >
> > Thanks
> > /sudha
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-657
> >
> > Thanks
> > /sudha
> 


Reply via email to