Great proposal! I also heard some feedback from the community on this. We need it. AFAIU, the HashData team will not release the UI tool as open source within the expected timeframe. So, let’s create an open source version.
To create a new GitHub repository, you can visit https://gitbox.apache.org/boxer/ with your Apache ID. For its function and roadmap, we can open an issue to collect ideas. Best, Dianjin Wang Leonid Borchuk <[email protected]>于2026年5月19日 周二22:33写道： > Hi, developers! > > I'd like to talk about the command center. ) > > I know it's a paid feature for historical reasons. Here in Russia, I might > count about 4 different command centers: one for sale and others for > internal purposes only. All of them are good at something, but they have > one significant drawback in common: they are closed-source. > > We had a discussion https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/discussions/1046 > . > > I want to move forward and propose an open-source command center. Right > now, it's worse than all the commercial counterparts. But as we have seen > many times before, all of them will eventually become obsolete, and only > open-source compatible solutions will remain. > > What I have: > 1. A special extension to send query data from CloudBerry to an external > agent > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/tree/main/gpcontrib/gp_stats_collector > 2. A service to gather and aggregate data > https://github.com/open-gpdb/yagpcc > > It has various interfaces - grpc/csv/json. And a generated UI (using LLM, I > do not understand how it works but it works). Times have changed and we > could easily generate other features like pg_dash has > https://github.com/avamingli/pg_dash > > What I would like to do: > 1. Create new cloudberry ecosystem repository > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry-command-center (need help with how to > do this ) ) > 2. Rename and move https://github.com/open-gpdb/yagpcc to > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry-command-center > 3. Seize power Declare it as a new open source command center and encourage > all those interested in developing the functionality to join and make > contributions. > > I would like to hear your thoughts on my initiative. Will it interfere with > other plans? Perhaps there is a better candidate. Perhaps the solution > should be significantly improved and only then called a command center. > > Looking forward to your thoughts. > > WBW, Leonid >
