Hi all, A quick update regarding the PXF packaging issue.
Thanks to Nikolay (@ostinru) for the feedback in the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry-pxf/issues/59 A fix has been proposed and submitted as a PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry-pxf/pull/77 This issue does not affect the ongoing release vote, since it only impacts the convenience binary packaging process. Once the PR is merged, we can simply update the corresponding files when building the convenience binaries. Thanks! Best, Dianjin Wang On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 6:26 PM Dianjin Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we are starting the vote for the Apache Cloudberry 2.1 release, I > did a small experiment to build convenience binaries based on the > source release. > > Using the existing scripts and Makefiles in the repositories, I > generated portable binary packages for the following projects: > > * cloudberry (main repository) > * cloudberry-pxf > * cloudberry-backup > > The generated artifacts have been uploaded here for testing: > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/17NBT7VRFbEoBpe3mzy6D-OUVImAMhWQO?usp=sharing > > This is mainly a test of the build process, and I would appreciate any > feedback on: > > * the overall packaging workflow > * whether the process follows Apache compliance practices > * any improvements we could make > > I also documented the build steps here: > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/wiki/Convenience-Binaries > > Just to clarify: this is not an official release artifact, and the > process described above is only an experiment to explore how > convenience binaries could be produced after a source release is > approved. > > Feedback and suggestions are very welcome. Thanks! > > Best, > Dianjin Wang --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
