Hi Ed, Thanks for pointing out these issues. They helped shape a better release.
1. For #1149, I admit that the filename change will have a few but not a significant impact on the traditional user, especially those who immigrated from Greenplum to Cloudberry. I'm not sure if we should add the following text to the disclaimer to avoid the name change: ``` Greenplum® is a registered trademark of Broadcom Inc. Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Broadcom Inc. Any references to Greenplum are for comparative, educational, and interoperability purposes only. ``` Above is the easiest way. If not, I support the file rename for better ASF compliance as soon as possible. As per your suggestion, we can explicitly document these changes in our changelogs. Here, we may also need the input from our mentors. 2. For #1148, in my opinion, it's not a high-priority issue, but it would improve the user experience if it could be improved before RC2. Let's try our best for this. Best, Dianjin Wang On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 10:06 AM Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > > -1 (binding) — from the Release Manager > > As the release manager for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) 2.0.0 RC1, I am > casting a binding -1 due to two release-blocking issues identified during > RC review and platform testing. > > What’s been verified: > > - > > Signatures and SHA512 checksums validate correctly > - > > LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files are present and appropriate > - > > No binary or compiled artifacts are bundled in the source release > - > > Apache RAT executed successfully using Maven (used only for license > audit) > - > > Functional testing and CLI output behave as expected > - > > Build tested successfully across the following platforms: > - > > Rocky Linux 9 > - > > Ubuntu 22.04 LTS > - > > Amazon Linux 2023 > - > > openSUSE Leap 15.5 > > Blocking Issue 1: Trademark Compliance – greenplum_path.sh and > generate-greenplum-path.sh > > The source release includes a user-visible script named greenplum_path.sh, > which is generated by gpMgmt/bin/generate-greenplum-path.sh during > installation. These filenames include the Greenplum trademark (owned by > Broadcom Inc.) and are active parts of the install process. > > ASF policy prohibits the use of third-party trademarks in filenames or > output unless clearly justified and disclaimed. These files may imply > affiliation or endorsement, which is not permitted. > > This issue is tracked at: > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/issues/1149 > > Blocking Issue 2: Build Failure with --enable-pax > > When building with the --enable-pax configuration option, the build fails > if the protobuf development environment is not available. The failure is > not detected during configure, and this leads to an unclear build > experience. > > This issue is tracked at: > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/issues/1148 > > Next Steps: > > I will re-roll RC2 once: > > - > > These two issues are resolved > - > > Installer and build behavior is confirmed across tested platforms > - > > Community consensus has been reached > > Request for community input: > > Before I proceed with RC2, I welcome feedback from PMC members and > contributors: > > - > > Do you agree that the trademarked filenames must be renamed for > compliance? > - > > Are there any other considerations we should account for before > preparing RC2? > > Thank you all for your continued review and support. Apologies again for > not catching these issues earlier in the process. > > -=e > (Release Manager, Apache Cloudberry (Incubating)) > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 12:59 AM Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to call a VOTE to release Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) > > 2.0.0-rc1 — the first official Apache release since the project entered > > incubation. > > > > While the community has produced releases prior to joining the Apache > > Software Foundation, this is our first release under the ASF's governance, > > following the official Apache release process and incorporating all > > relevant legal, licensing, and distribution requirements. > > > > --- > > > > Release Candidate Artifacts > > > > Staged release > > artifacts:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/cloudberry/2.0.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > > Git > > tag:https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/releases/tag/2.0.0-incubating-rc1 > > > > Commit:https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/commit/ce1fc9438989ac22146c1c7e483933f3560e6572 > > > > PGP signature key: > > 3B90B5634E4506F05BA51F2FC9604135C07CD12A — Ed Espino (esp...@apache.org) > > > > KEYS file:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/cloudberry/KEYS > > > > How to Vote > > Please review the release and cast your vote below. If you are a PPMC > > member, please indicate whether your vote is binding. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Disapprove (please explain why) > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close no earlier than June > > 8, 2025 at 08:00 UTC. > > > > Checklist for reference: > > > > [ ] Download links are valid and accessible. > > [ ] PGP signature is valid for the release artifact using the KEYS file. > > [ ] SHA512 checksums are correct and verified. > > [ ] Source release artifact filename includes "incubating". > > [ ] LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files exist and are accurate. > > [ ] No unexpected binary files in the source release. > > [ ] All source files have appropriate ASF headers (excluding generated > > files and legacy files). > > [ ] Build completes successfully from source with clear instructions. > > > > PGP Signature and SHA512 checksums Verification Instructions > > > > Please refer to our step-by-step > > guide:https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/wiki/Apache-PGP-Signature-and-SHA512-Checksum-Verification > > > > About Convenience Binaries > > > > As this is our initial release under the Apache Software Foundation, we are > > not providing any convenience binaries (such as .rpm, .deb, or Docker > > images) as part of this vote. The official release consists solely of the > > source artifacts linked above. > > > > We will be gathering input from the development community on which > > convenience binaries would be most useful and plan to make them available > > in the near future via appropriate non-release channels. > > > > Please note: any such convenience binaries will not be official ASF > > releases and will be clearly labeled as such, in accordance with ASF policy. > > > > --- > > > > Thanks for reviewing and voting! > > > > Best, > > -=Ed Espino > > (on behalf of the Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) community) > > > > --- > > > > Note: follow ASF release policy and Incubator guidelines: > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > > > > -- > > Ed Espino > > Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) & MADlib > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudberry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cloudberry.apache.org
