It's good that we are starting to work on the pg_upgrade now. On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM Kirill Reshke <res...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 00:14, Kirill Reshke <reshkekir...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I tried gp_upgrade once again today. Our gp 6 fork is here[1]. > > Currently, there is some vital work from GP7 missing in CBDB, so I did > > a cherry-pick PR [2]. Most probably, gpupgrade will need some more > > attention after [2] merged, this is what I'm currently working on. > > > > [1] https://github.com/open-gpdb/gpupgrade > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/898 > > > > Today I was hacking a new set of pg_upgrade cherry-picks [0]. While > doing so, I discovered that Apache Cloudberry (CDBD) has basically no > CI for pg_upgrade (and thus, gp_upgrade). I believe this open source > project should derive the best service and experience to its community > and users, and thus we need to begin supporting gp_upgrade scenarios > (or, at least, activity in that direction). This includes, at very > least, CDBD to CDBD binary upgrade support. In ideal case, with > release of CDBD there will be support for 1.6 to 2.0 binary upgrade > using gp_upgrade, along with comprehensive instructions on how to > handle specific problems. I am aware that this is overly optimistic, > though. > > I'll keep working in this direction, attempting to engage as many > engineer resources (other pg/cbdb hackers) as possible. I cannot, > however, promise that I will be successful here by the release of 2.0. > > [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/955 > > -- > Best regards, > Kirill Reshke > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudberry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cloudberry.apache.org > >
