[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAUSEWAY-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17802729#comment-17802729
 ] 

Daniel Keir Haywood commented on CAUSEWAY-3081:
-----------------------------------------------

have added a new config property to support this, but checking is disabled by 
default.

 

causeway.extensions.secman.fixture-scripts.abstract-role-and-permissions-fixture-script.unknown-feature-id-checking-policy

 

> Check for existence of feature in fixturescript
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAUSEWAY-3081
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAUSEWAY-3081
>             Project: Causeway
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Ext Sec Secman
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M8
>            Reporter: Patrick Deenen
>            Assignee: Daniel Keir Haywood
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-RC5
>
>
> When one defines a fixture based on AbstractRoleAndPermissionsFixtureScript 
> using newPermissions NO check is done if the new permission is actually 
> referring to an actual valid feature. Hence it is possible to define 
> permissions that have no effect or have no effect. So it would be better to 
> at least check is the member exist.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to