+1

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:40 AM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 at 13:58, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, at 7:56 AM, Josh McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> [DISCUSS] thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vr7j2ob92k6fbcwvlfo60l3scylzdbft
>>
>> Text to vote on:
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *[New LTS JDK Adoption]*
>>
>>    - When a new JDK goes LTS, we prioritize:
>>
>>
>>    - Moving trunk to build, run, pass CI, and support language level of
>>       that JDK, dropping others
>>       - Adding support to *run* on that JDK to all supported GA
>>       releases, passing all CI using that JDK
>>    - These 2 operations must merge atomically. This allows us to
>>    preserve the contract of allowing like-to-like JDK's for a live C* upgrade
>>
>> *[Build, run, language level, Pre Commit CI, EOL]*
>>
>>    - trunk builds, runs, has CI on, and supports the language level of 1
>>    JDK at any given time (ideally latest LTS JDK)
>>
>>
>>    - Supported non-trunk GA branches:
>>       - build, run, pass CI, and support the language level of *the
>>       oldest JDK they are certified for*
>>       - Are supported to *run* on all LTS JDK's between their oldest
>>       supported and newest LTS supported by trunk
>>    - In the very rare case a feature would have to be removed due to JDK
>>    change (think UDF's scripting engine), we instead keep the maximum
>>    allowable JDK for that feature supported on trunk and subsequent releases.
>>    The feature is flagged for deprecate-then-remove or re-implementation 
>> based
>>    on dev ML discussion. If removed, we drop the required older JDK across 
>> all
>>    branches when the feature is removed. Supporting new LTS JDK's is
>>    considered higher priority than supporting features that JDK's are no
>>    longer compatible with, pending debate on the dev ML.
>>
>>
>>    - Dropping JDK support happens naturally as old releases go EOL.
>>
>> *[Post Commit JDK validation CI]*
>>
>>    - Periodically we will run all CI pipelines for all *runtime*
>>    supported JDK's for that branch (cadence TBD)
>>    - We will add basic perf testing across all GA branches + their
>>    supported runtime JDK's with reference workloads from easy-cass-stress for
>>    a simple performance-based smoke test
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Vote structure:
>>
>>    - Roll call
>>    
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance>
>>    is 25.
>>    - Quorum: 13 (min required votes to qualify results)
>>    - Super-majority of participating votes in favor required to pass (9
>>    in favor at 13 min votes, etc)
>>
>> Will leave the vote open for a week.
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to