On Jan 29, 2025 at 3:32:13 PM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> My opinion is that it would be valuable to take this discussion as a > forcing function to determine how we plan to handle releases broadly to > answer the "5.1 should be 6.0" question. Assuming we move away from ad hoc > per-release debate. If there's broad strong dissent (i.e. let's have 6.0 be > the next major and talk about this topic separately) I'm happy to open > another thread, but I didn't see clear consensus on this thread yet and was > trying to help drive to that. > We are 30 messages deep into this thread. So I am guessing we have lost a lot of people from it already. If you want a broad discussion, I would still suggest a new thread where the subject line is the broad subject you want to discuss …
