> On Oct 1, 2024, at 10:28 AM, Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello fellow secondary index enjoyers!
>
> If you're familiar with index queries, you probably know that they are
> treated as range reads no matter what. This is true even if the user query
> restricts results to a single partition. This means that they bypass the
> digest read process that normal single-partition reads do.
TIL.
>
> While I don't think this is something that we need to consider for 5.0, I
> would be very interested in the next major release being able to use proper
> single-partition reads for partition-restricted index queries, allowing them
> to take advantage of digest reads. (If single partition slice queries do it,
> why not index queries?)
This seems like an obvious yes, so reverse the question - is there any reason
why we WOULDNT want to do this?
(Higher rate of mismatches requiring a second full read? Why would 2i be more
likely?)
