Not quite; finishing touches on the CEP and design doc are in flight (as of 
last / this week).

Soon(tm).

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, at 2:07 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
> Is this CEP ready for a VOTE thread? 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-37+%28DRAFT%29+Apache+Cassandra+Unified+Repair+Solution
> 
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:25 PM Jaydeep Chovatia 
> <chovatia.jayd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, Josh. I've just updated the CEP 
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-37+%28DRAFT%29+Apache+Cassandra+Official+Repair+Solution>
>>  and included all the solutions you mentioned below.  
>> 
>> Jaydeep
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:33 AM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> __
>>> Very late response from me here (basically necro'ing this thread).
>>> 
>>> I think it'd be useful to get this condensed into a CEP that we can then 
>>> discuss in that format. It's clearly something we all agree we need and 
>>> having an implementation that works, even if it's not in your preferred 
>>> execution domain, is vastly better than nothing IMO.
>>> 
>>> I don't have cycles (nor background ;) ) to do that, but it sounds like you 
>>> do Jaydeep given the implementation you have on a private fork + design.
>>> 
>>> A non-exhaustive list of things that might be useful incorporating into or 
>>> referencing from a CEP:
>>> Slack thread: https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CK23JSY2K/p1690225062383619
>>> Joey's old C* ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14346
>>> Even older automatic repair scheduling: 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10070
>>> Your design gdoc: 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CJWxjEi-mBABPMZ3VWJ9w5KavWfJETAGxfUpsViPcPo/edit#heading=h.r112r46toau0
>>> PR with automated repair: 
>>> https://github.com/jaydeepkumar1984/cassandra/commit/ef6456d652c0d07cf29d88dfea03b73704814c2c
>>> 
>>> My intuition is that we're all basically in agreement that this is 
>>> something the DB needs, we're all willing to bikeshed for our personal 
>>> preference on where it lives and how it's implemented, and at the end of 
>>> the day, code talks. I don't think anyone's said they'll die on the hill of 
>>> implementation details, so that feels like CEP time to me.
>>> 
>>> If you were willing and able to get a CEP together for automated repair 
>>> based on the above material, given you've done the work and have the proof 
>>> points it's working at scale, I think this would be a *huge contribution* 
>>> to the community.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Jaydeep Chovatia wrote:
>>>> Is anyone going to file an official CEP for this?
>>>> As mentioned in this email thread, here is one of the solution's design 
>>>> doc 
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CJWxjEi-mBABPMZ3VWJ9w5KavWfJETAGxfUpsViPcPo/edit#heading=h.r112r46toau0>
>>>>  and source code on a private Apache Cassandra patch. Could you go through 
>>>> it and let me know what you think?
>>>> 
>>>> Jaydeep
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:54 PM Jon Haddad <rustyrazorbl...@apache.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > That said I would happily support an effort to bring repair scheduling 
>>>>> > to the sidecar immediately. This has nothing blocking it, and would 
>>>>> > potentially enable the sidecar to provide an official repair scheduling 
>>>>> > solution that is compatible with current or even previous versions of 
>>>>> > the database.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is something I hadn't thought much about, and is a pretty good 
>>>>> argument for using the sidecar initially.  There's a lot of deployments 
>>>>> out there and having an official repair option would be a big win. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2023/07/26 23:20:07 "C. Scott Andreas" wrote:
>>>>> > I agree that it would be ideal for Cassandra to have a repair scheduler 
>>>>> > in-DB.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > That said I would happily support an effort to bring repair scheduling 
>>>>> > to the sidecar immediately. This has nothing blocking it, and would 
>>>>> > potentially enable the sidecar to provide an official repair scheduling 
>>>>> > solution that is compatible with current or even previous versions of 
>>>>> > the database.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Once TCM has landed, we’ll have much stronger primitives for repair 
>>>>> > orchestration in the database itself. But I don’t think that should 
>>>>> > block progress on a repair scheduling solution in the sidecar, and 
>>>>> > there is nothing that would prevent someone from continuing to use a 
>>>>> > sidecar-based solution in perpetuity if they preferred.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Scott
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > On Jul 26, 2023, at 3:25 PM, Jon Haddad <rustyrazorbl...@apache.org> 
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I'm 100% in favor of repair being part of the core DB, not the 
>>>>> > > sidecar.  The current (and past) state of things where running the DB 
>>>>> > > correctly *requires* running a separate process (either community 
>>>>> > > maintained or official C* sidecar) is incredibly painful for folks.  
>>>>> > > The idea that your data integrity needs to be opt-in has never made 
>>>>> > > sense to me from the perspective of either the product or the end 
>>>>> > > user.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I've worked with way too many teams that have either configured this 
>>>>> > > incorrectly or not at all. 
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Ideally Cassandra would ship with repair built in and on by default.  
>>>>> > > Power users can disable if they want to continue to maintain their 
>>>>> > > own repair tooling for some reason.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Jon
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >> On 2023/07/24 20:44:14 German Eichberger via dev wrote:
>>>>> > >> All,
>>>>> > >> We had a brief discussion in [2] about the Uber article [1] where 
>>>>> > >> they talk about having integrated repair into Cassandra and how 
>>>>> > >> great that is. I expressed my disappointment that they didn't work 
>>>>> > >> with the community on that (Uber, if you are listening time to make 
>>>>> > >> amends 🙂) and it turns out Joey already had the idea and wrote the 
>>>>> > >> code [3] - so I wanted to start a discussion to gauge interest and 
>>>>> > >> maybe how to revive that effort.
>>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>>> > >> German
>>>>> > >> [1] 
>>>>> > >> https://www.uber.com/blog/how-uber-optimized-cassandra-operations-at-scale/
>>>>> > >> [2] https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CK23JSY2K/p1690225062383619
>>>>> > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14346
>>>>> >
>>> 

Reply via email to