+1. I'm ultimately in favor of setting the precedent of allowing low-risk ecosystem interop changes in non-trunk.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 2:10 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > +1 > > I think this is a low risk change which is going to avoid duplication of > effort so it is worth it. > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 11:19 PM Yifan Cai <yc25c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. >> >> There is a discussion thread >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/oojdsh7oy3pxszrnghxld7m0wmh4tk40> on the >> topic. In summary, the backport would benefit Cassandra Analytics by >> providing a unified solution, and the patch is considered low-risk. While >> there are concerns about adding features to 4.0 and 4.1, there is generally >> support for 5.0. >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Votes by PMC members >> are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding >> +1s and no -1's. >> >> Kind regards, >> Yifan Cai
