No intention of touching WITH id in CQL On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:10 PM Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To clarify, my plan was to deprecate in Config/JMX and ignore it, not > remove it entirely so it breaks existing YAMLs and JMX clients. > > This should be fine, if I'm reading the upgrade notes correctly, as no > table or view creation operations will be allowed on 5.1 nodes until > upgrade is complete and the CMS has been initialized. > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 3:54 PM J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 to deprecate it. What does removing it buy us? >> >> On Jul 30, 2024, at 3:52 PM, David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> Users can provide ids and TCM can manage to make them safe, so agree we >> don’t really need the feature anymore. I am fine with deprecating the >> feature, but removing would be a breaking change for anyone that had that >> config in place, so not a fan of breaking the config interface. >> >> On Jul 30, 2024, at 1:38 PM, Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose removing deterministic table IDs for new *user* >> tables and views in trunk. With TCM in place, it looks like the reason we >> added *use_deterministic_table_id*, concurrent table creations, is no >> longer a concern. >> >> Thoughts? Objections? >> >> >>
