Hello everyone,

During the implementation, many valid design comments were made about
making the virtual table SettingTable [1] updatable. So, I've
rethought the whole concept once again, and I want to take another
step forward to make this problem feasible with less effort on our
part.

I want to replace the way we use and store node configuration values
internally, which means I want to replace the Config class instance,
where we store values with a tree-based framework.
>> I propose to use the Lightbend API to do this. <<

The changes themselves are quite limited, they don't require rewriting
the whole codebase. All the DatabaseDescriptor methods will be
retained, and the only thing that would change is the way we store the
values (in the in-memory tree, not in the Config class instance
itself). So I don't expect that it will be a huge change.


All the design details are in the document below, including the
framework comparison, the API, and the way how we will manage the
configuration schema.

Please take a look, I want to move things forward as every important
change pulls on a bigger problem that has been neglected for years :-)
Let's agree on the framework/API we want to use so that I can invest
more time in the implementation.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/11W1Qj-6d9ZqHv86iEKgFutcxY2DTMIofEbr-zQiw930/edit#heading=h.2051pbez4rce

Looking forward to your comments.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15254

Reply via email to