+1 to in-tree

> On Nov 27, 2023, at 9:17 AM, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Le lun. 27 nov. 2023 à 18:01, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:dri...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> I am +1 on including Harry in-tree.
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> Brandon
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 9:44 AM Alex Petrov <al...@coffeenco.de 
>> <mailto:al...@coffeenco.de>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > With TCM landed, there will be way more Harry tests in-tree: we are using 
>> > it for many coordination tests, and there's now a simulator test that uses 
>> > Harry. During development, Harry has allowed us to uncover and resolve 
>> > numerous elusive edge cases.
>> >
>> > I had conversations with several folks, and wanted to propose to move 
>> > harry-core to Cassandra test tree. This will substantially 
>> > simplify/streamline co-development of Cassandra and Harry. With a new 
>> > HistoryBuilder API that has helped to find and trigger [1] [2] and [3], it 
>> > will also be much more approachable.
>> >
>> > Besides making it easier for everyone to develop new fuzz tests, it will 
>> > also substantially lower the barrier to entry. Currently, debugging an 
>> > issue found by Harry involves a cumbersome process of rebuilding and 
>> > transferring jars between Cassandra and Harry, depending on which side you 
>> > modify. This not only hampers efficiency but also deters broader adoption. 
>> > By merging harry-core into the Cassandra test tree, we eliminate this 
>> > barrier.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > --Alex
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19011
>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18993
>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18932

Reply via email to