For my understanding, isn’t it gonna be an issue to be copyrighted also to a single person? For the same reasons?
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 at 7:59, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Just for my understanding on this. Is the issue that the code has a >> copyright header on it or that it is copyright to a corporate entity? >> > > > The potential issue here is about dependence upon one vendor (or > commercial actor). > If the project is not usable without a specific piece of work (library) > that is controlled and maintained elsewhere, and exercising our freedom to > rewrite/fork is difficult, the project isn't really independent. Being > independent is an important tenant for ASF projects. > > I don't see this being an issue with jamm or jvector. But I do think it's > important to check. > >
