I support including this in 5.0.

This looks to me like a significant correctness and stabilization effort, very 
similar to other large bodies of work we merged in post freeze for testing and 
stabilizing 4.0.

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, at 5:42 PM, Chris Lohfink wrote:
> I absolutely love the idea of this being in 5.0, I am +1 for what it is worth
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:04 PM David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com> wrote:
>> To try to get repair more stable, I added optional retry logic (patch is 
>> still in review) to a handful of critical repair verbs.  This patch is 
>> disabled by default but allows you to opt-in to retries so ephemeral issues 
>> don’t cause a repair to fail after running for a long time (assuming they 
>> resolve within the retry window). There are 2 protocol level changes to 
>> enable this: VALIDATION_RSP and SYNC_RSP now send an ACK (if the sender 
>> doesn’t attach a callback, these ACKs get ignored in all versions; see 
>> org.apache.cassandra.net.ResponseVerbHandler#doVerb and Verb.REPAIR_RSP).  
>> Given that we have already forked, I believe we would need to give a waiver 
>> to allow this patch due to this change.
>> 
>> The patch was written on trunk, but figured back porting 5.0 would be rather 
>> trivial and this was brought up during the review, so floating this to a 
>> wider audience.
>> 
>> If you look at the patch you will see that it is very large, but this is 
>> only to make testing of repair coordination easier and deterministic, the 
>> biggest code changes are:
>> 
>> 1) Moving from ActiveRepairService.instance to 
>> ActiveRepairService.instance() (this is the main reason so many files were 
>> touched; this was needed so unit tests don’t load the whole world)
>> 2) Repair no longer reaches into global space and instead is provided the 
>> subsystems needed to perform repair; this change is local to repair code
>> 
>> Both of these changes were only for testing as they allow us to simulate 1k 
>> repairs in around 15 seconds with 100% deterministic execution.

Reply via email to