Thank you for your work and the prompt update, Maxim! We seem to have a lazy consensus here so I suggest we continue all operational discussions on the tickets themselves (not only the mentioned ones but also any other dependency management tickets that might be open). My understanding is that people are happy with some careful housekeeping in the cassandra-5.0 branch while we are still not feature-complete.
Best regards, Ekaterina On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 16:23, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > A few updates. > > We've posted a message to the user-list asking the question about the > use of the metrics-reporter-config library to make sure we are on the > safe side with the removal: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/c4m3tc08zhd4d41zs05jcdkr3gjwlhno > > The issue for the `org.caffinitas.ohc:ohc-core-j8` is here, we'll try > to handle it: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18799 > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 18:39, Ekaterina Dimitrova <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thank you all. We are going to continue with those tickets and related > problems then. > > > > On Maxim's question: > > "Do we need a separate issue for 'org.caffinitas.ohc:ohc-core-j8' or we > should handle everything under [2]?" > > > > It depends on whether someone has the time to sit and deal with the > complete list as soon as possible or we should do divide and conquer. It > will also require some archeology and potential discussions with users in > some cases, etc. > > > > Best regards, > > Ekaterina > > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 17:29, Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote: > >> > >> > I also want to hear if Abe still has concerns about not following > deprecation process here. > >> > >> I support removing the library on an expedited schedule, rather than > waiting for a full major of deprecation. We still have a large surface for > metrics integrations, and users who depended on metrics-reporter-config > will have a path forward if they need similar functionality. > >> > >> On Aug 23, 2023, at 07:28, Ekaterina Dimitrova <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I also want to hear if Abe still has concerns about not following > deprecation process here. >