> > Did we agree on a CQL syntax? > > I don’t believe there has been a pool on CQL syntax… my understanding > reading all the threads is that there are ~4-5 options and non are -1ed, so > believe we are waiting for majority rule on this? >
Re-reading that thread, IIUC the valid choices remaining are… 1. VECTOR FLOAT[n] 2. FLOAT VECTOR[n] 3. VECTOR<FLOAT,n> 4. VECTOR[n]<FLOAT> 5. ARRAY<FLOAT, n> 6. NON-NULL FROZEN<FLOAT[n]> Yes I'm putting my preference (1) first ;) because (banging on) if the future of CQL will have FLOAT[n] and FROZEN<FLOAT[n]>, where the VECTOR keyword is: for general cql users; just meaning "non-null and frozen", these gel best together. Options (5) and (6) are for those that feel we can and should provide this type without introducing the vector keyword.
