Oh, that's significantly different and great news, please do! Thanks for the clarification, Doug!
Kind Regards, Brandon On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4:42 PM Doug Rohrer <droh...@apple.com> wrote: > > I agree that the analytics library will need to support vnodes. To be clear, > there’s nothing preventing the solution from working with vnodes right now, > and no assumptions about a 1:1 topology between a token and a node. However, > we don’t, today, have the ability to test vnode support end-to-end. We are > working towards that, however, and should be able to remove the caveat from > the released analytics library once we can properly test vnode support. > If it helps, I can update the CEP to say something more like “Caveat: > Currently untested with vnodes - work is ongoing to remove this limitation” > if that helps? > > Doug > > > On Mar 24, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:39 AM Jeremiah D Jordan > > <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I have concerns with the majority of this being in the sidecar and not in > >> the database itself. I think it would make sense for the server side of > >> this to be a new service exposed by the database, not in the sidecar. > >> That way it can be able to properly integrate with the authentication and > >> authorization apis, and to make it a first class citizen in terms of > >> having unit/integration tests in the main DB ensuring no one breaks it. > > > > I don't think this can/should happen until it supports the database's > > default configuration with vnodes. >
