Since Accord depends on transactional meta-data... is there really any
alternative than what you propose?

Sure, if there is some subset of Accord that could be merged, while work
continues on a branched that is based on CEP-21 branch, that would be
great. Merging even a prototype of Accord to trunk probably has marketing
value. (Don't laugh, many popular databases have had "atomic transactions,
except if anyone executes DDL simultaneously".)

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:39 PM Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We've already talked a bit
> <https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@cassandra.apache.org:2023-1:Merging%20CEP-15%20to%20trunk>
> about how and when the current Accord feature branch should merge to trunk.
> Earlier today, the cep-21-tcm branch was created
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/qkwnhgq02cn12jon2h565kh2gpzp9rry> to
> house ongoing work on Transactional Metadata.
>
> Returning to CASSANDRA-18196
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18196> (merging Accord
> to trunk) after working on some other issues, I want to propose changing
> direction slightly, and make sure this makes sense to everyone else.
>
> 1.) There are a few minor Accord test issues in progress that I'd like to
> wrap up before doing anything, but those shouldn't take long. (See
> CASSANDRA-18302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18302>
>  and CASSANDRA-18320
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18320>.)
> 2.) Accord logically depends on Transactional Metadata.
> 3.) The new cep-21-tcm branch is going to have to be rebased to trunk on
> a regular basis.
>
> So...
>
> 4.) I would like to pause merging cep-15-accord to trunk, and instead
> rebase it on cep-21-tcm until such time as the latter merges to trunk, at
> which point cep-15-accord can be rebased to trunk again and then merged
> when ready, nominally taking up the work of CASSANDRA-18196
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18196> again.
>
> Any objections to this?
>


-- 

Henrik Ingo

c. +358 40 569 7354

w. www.datastax.com

<https://www.facebook.com/datastax>  <https://twitter.com/datastax>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/datastax/>  <https://github.com/datastax/>

Reply via email to