Yes exactly. If we are updating a library for some reason, we should update it to the latest one that makes sense.

On Mar 13, 2023, at 1:17 PM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:


I think we should we use the most recent versions of all libraries where possible?”
To clarify, are we talking "most recent versions of all libraries when we have to update them anyway for a dependency"? Not all libraries all libraries...

If the former, I agree. If the latter, here be dragons. :)

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, at 1:13 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
 > Given we need to upgrade to support JDK17 it seems fine to me.  The only concern I have is that some of those libraries are already pretty old, for example the most recent jna-platform is 5.13.0 and 5.5.0 is almost 4 years old.  I think we should we use the most recent versions of all libraries where possible?”
+1

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 12:10, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know it was just an example but we upgraded JNA to 5.13 in
CASSANDRA-18050 as part of the JDK17 effort, so at least that is taken
care of.

Kind Regards,
Brandon

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:39 AM Jeremiah D Jordan
>
> Given we need to upgrade to support JDK17 it seems fine to me.  The only concern I have is that some of those libraries are already pretty old, for example the most recent jna-platform is 5.13.0 and 5.5.0 is almost 4 years old.  I think we should we use the most recent versions of all libraries where possible?
>
> > On Mar 13, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > JDK17 requires us to update our chronicle-queue dependency: CASSANDRA-18049
> >
> > We use chronicle-queue for both audit logging and fql.
> >
> > This update pulls in a number of new transitive dependencies.
> >
> > affinity-3.23ea1.jar
> > asm-analysis-9.2.jar
> > asm-commons-9.2.jar
> > asm-tree-9.2.jar
> > asm-util-9.2.jar
> > jffi-1.3.9.jar
> > jna-platform-5.5.0.jar
> > jnr-a64asm-1.0.0.jar
> > jnr-constants-0.10.3.jar
> > jnr-ffi-2.2.11.jar
> > jnr-x86asm-1.0.2.jar
> > posix-2.24ea4.jar
> >
> >
> > More info here:
> >
> >
> > Objections?
>

Reply via email to