Anything we either a) have to do (JDK support) or b) have all agreed up front we think we should do (CEP). I.e. things with a lower risk of being left dead in the codebase partially implemented.
I don't think it's a coincidence we've set up other processes to help de-risk and streamline the consensus building portion of this work given our history with it. We haven't taken steps to optimize the tactical execution of it yet. On Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:06 AM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > My current thinking: I'd like to propose we all agree to move to merge work > > into trunk incrementally if it's either: > > 1) New JDK support > > 2) An approved CEP > > So basically everything? I'm not sure what large complex bodies of > work would be left. >
