These tickets have all met the standard integration requirements, so I’m > just unclear what “higher pre-commit gateway” you are referring to. >
A merge into trunk deserves extra eyeballs than a merge into a feature branch. We can refer to this as a "higher pre-commit gateway" or a "second pass". Either way I believe it is a good thing. > I think the existing epics are probably more natural tickets to reference > in the merge, eg 17091 and 17092. > If _all_ tickets in that epic are being merged, sure. Otherwise how can I see what resolved tickets are in trunk and what resolved tickets are not… I would rather not have to be working on accord actively to be able to see this stuff quickly.
