> if that is standard for this project I will move the information there. It is. I'd go to a CEP if you have something you think might be controversial (due to design, size, whatever) and you want to get early consensus on before going to deep on implementation.
I'm in favor of JIRA + DISCUSS (+benchmarks) as well fwiw. On Tue, Sep 6, 2022, at 2:28 AM, Benedict wrote: > I agree a Jira would suffice, and if visibility there required a DISCUSS > thread or simply a notice sent to the list. > > While we’re here though, while I don’t have a lot of time to engage in > discussion it’s unclear to me what advantage this encoding scheme brings. It > might be worth outlining what algorithmic advantage you foresee for what data > distributions in which collection types. > > > On 6 Sep 2022, at 07:16, Claude Warren via dev <dev@cassandra.apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > I am just learning the ropes here so perhaps it is not CEP worthy. That > > being said, It felt like there was a lot of information to put into and > > track in a ticket, particularly when I expected discussion about how to > > best encode, changes to the algorithms etc. It feels like it would be > > difficult to track. But if that is standard for this project I will move > > the information there. > > > > As to the benchmarking, I had thought that usage and performance measures > > should be included. Thank you for calling out the subset of data selected > > query as being of particular importance. > > > > Claude > > > >> On 06/09/2022 03:11, Abe Ratnofsky wrote: > >> Looking at this link: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-23%3A++Enhancement+for+Sparse+Data+Serialization > >> > >> Do you have any plans to include benchmarks in your test plan? It would be > >> useful to include disk usage / read performance / write performance > >> comparisons with the new encodings, particularly for sparse collections > >> where a subset of data is selected out of a collection. > >> > >> I do wonder whether this is CEP-worthy. The CEP says that the changes will > >> not impact existing users, will be backwards compatible, and overall is an > >> efficiency improvement. The CEP guidelines say a CEP is encouraged “for > >> significant user-facing or changes that cut across multiple subsystems”. > >> Any reason why a Jira isn’t sufficient? > >> > >> Abe > >> > >>>> On Sep 5, 2022, at 1:57 AM, Claude Warren via dev > >>>> <dev@cassandra.apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> I have just posted a CEP covering an Enhancement for Sparse Data > >>> Serialzation. This is in response to CASSANDRA-8959 > >>> > >>> I look forward to responses. > >>> > >>> > >
