Better yet strive to maintain backward compatibility. There are very very few 
occasions where backward compatibility breakage is warranted. 

> On Jun 15, 2022, at 10:59 AM, bened...@apache.org wrote:
> 
> 
> > I agree a broader consensus beyond those on the jira ticket should be 
> > sought before committing the patch that bumps a new major.
>  
> Broader consensus should be sought on any ticket that breaks backwards 
> compatibility – even if we already have bumped major version.
>  
> A major version bump should NOT be taken as carte blanche to break users, we 
> should determine it for eadh case on a balance of benefit/cost.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org>
> Date: Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 17:44
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org <dev@cassandra.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Cassandra project biweekly status update 2022-06-14
> 
> I'm going to jump off the email list to JIRA for this one - we've had a 
> discussion ongoing about when we cut a Major vs. a Minor, what qualifies as 
> an API, etc on CASSANDRA-16844 
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16844). Expect something to 
> formally hit the dev mailing list about this soon, but until then we can keep 
> going on the JIRA ticket.
>  
>  
> I need to take some blame here, for leading people down a bit of a garden 
> path.
>  
> The idea was that trunk is by default the next minor, and that when a patch 
> lands that warrants a bump to the next major then the patch includes that 
> change to build.xml's base.version.
>  
> The devil is in the detail here, and it becomes a lot more clearer when 
> reading CASSANDRA-16844.  I'm appreciative when we can tackle these things in 
> a lazy manner as they arise as real examples often bring that extra clarity.
>  
> I agree a broader consensus beyond those on the jira ticket should be sought 
> before committing the patch that bumps a new major. The broader audience may 
> also help propose better solutions that don't require a major change (as was 
> done in 16844), and help coordinate with other tickets also warranting a new 
> major…

Reply via email to