Sorry, I missed your reply. Yes it is what you described. Le jeu. 10 mars 2022 à 11:25, Claude Warren <claude.war...@instaclustr.com> a écrit :
> I found it in https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4.git and I suspected it > was wrong. I assume it should be that the tuple can contain 1 or more > elements and the elements may be of type tuple, constant, map, list or > set. > > Does that make sense? I think that is what I saw in the code base. > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 09:38, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Claude, >> >> I am not aware of the CqlParser.g4 file in our code base. Where did you >> find that file? >> >> At first glance effectively something looks wrong in the syntax. The >> construct ((4 ,5 ), 6, (7, 8)) should be legal in CQL. >> >> Le jeu. 10 mars 2022 à 06:50, Claude Warren < >> claude.war...@instaclustr.com> a écrit : >> >>> I have been looking at CqlParser.g4 file for cql3 and have a question >>> about assignment tuples. The assignment tuple is defined as : >>> >>> assignmentTuple >>> : syntaxBracketLr ( >>> constant ((syntaxComma constant)* | (syntaxComma >>> assignmentTuple)*) | >>> assignmentTuple (syntaxComma assignmentTuple)* >>> ) syntaxBracketRr >>> ; >>> >>> which I read to be ( constant [, constant | tuple ... ]) or ( tuple [, >>> tuple...]) . So the construct ((4 ,5 ), 6, (7, 8)) is not a legal >>> tuple.2 questions: >>> >>> 1. Is my interpretation of the grammar correct? >>> 2. Is my example tuple supposed to be allowed? >>> >>> >>> Claude >>> >>> -- >>> >>> [image: Instaclustr logo] >>> >>> >>> *Claude Warren* >>> >>> Principal Software Engineer >>> >>> Instaclustr >>> >>> >>> >>>
