>
> "All releases by default are expected to have a green test run on
> ci-cassandra Jenkins. In exceptional circumstances (security incidents,
> data loss, etc requiring hotfix), members with binding votes on a release
> may choose to approve a release with known failing tests."


+1 with the amendment.

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:01 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova <e.dimitr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>  +1 w/ Joey's amendment
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 13:00, Michael Shuler <mich...@pbandjelly.org>
> wrote:
>
>> (still) +1 as amended
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On 1/12/22 11:54, Caleb Rackliffe wrote:
>> > +1 w/ Joey's amendment
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:04 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org
>> > <mailto:jmcken...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     I'd say an amendment with a directional poll would be fine. I don't
>> >     think this is controversial.
>> >
>> >     That's me taking "the spirit of the law" rather than the letter
>> >     though. I'm good either way.
>> >
>> >     ~Josh
>> >
>> >     On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:51 AM Joseph Lynch <
>> joe.e.ly...@gmail.com
>> >     <mailto:joe.e.ly...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >         On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:43 AM Joshua McKenzie
>> >         <jmcken...@apache.org <mailto:jmcken...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >          >
>> >          > I fully concede your point and concern Joey but I propose we
>> >         phrase that differently to emphasize the importance of clean
>> tests.
>> >          >
>> >          > "All releases by default are expected to have a green test
>> >         run on ci-cassandra Jenkins. In exceptional circumstances
>> >         (security incidents, data loss, etc requiring hotfix), members
>> >         with binding votes on a release may choose to approve a release
>> >         with known failing tests."
>> >
>> >         I like the balance that strikes. Should we re-vote or should I
>> >         propose
>> >         that text as an amendment after this vote (since a simple
>> majority
>> >         will likely be reached)?
>> >
>> >         -Joey
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to