On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:48 AM bened...@apache.org <bened...@apache.org> wrote:
> That’s probably not a good reason here, and I agree that overloading > consistency level feels wrong. I hope we will retire user-provided > consistency levels over the coming year or two, which is another good > reason not to begin enhancing it with new meanings. I would love to see CLs simplified. Even without user-provided CL we almost certainly have too many. Providing a migration path is the hard part.
