+1

> On Sep 9, 2021, at 10:27 AM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1, much appreciated.
> 
> 
> On 2021/09/09 16:03:31, Andrés de la Peña <a.penya.gar...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> +1, thanks for the proposal.
>> 
>> On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:39 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here)
>>>> 
>>>> For context, we have a long history of an ebb and flow of flaky test
>>>> failures building up and getting burned down, but don't really have a
>>>> workflow or discipline around having a clean snapshot of where we are or
>>>> attempting to stay at some kind of steady state. We have thousands of
>>> tests
>>>> executing in a wide variety of environments: this state is to be
>>> expected,
>>>> but I argue needs to be actively managed so we don't get into the kind of
>>>> situation we did with 4.0 again.
>>>> 
>>>> I threw together a couple of JIRA queries that paint a pretty navigable
>>>> picture IMO:
>>>> 
>>>> Total JIRA for test failures:
>>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12350869&jql=project%20%3D%20Cassandra%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20unresolved%20AND%20(summary%20~%20flaky%20OR%20summary%20~%20test%20OR%20component%20%3D%20%22Test%2Funit%22)%20AND%20type%20%3D%20bug%20AND%20issuekey%20not%20in%20(CASSANDRA-16010%2C%20CASSANDRA-16024%2C%20CASSANDRA-16022%2C%20CASSANDRA-16021%2C%20CASSANDRA-16025%2C%20CASSANDRA-16023)%20AND%20summary%20!~%20hardening%20ORDER%20BY%20cf%5B12313825%5D%20ASC
>>>> (sorry for the URL) - 112 failures
>>>> 
>>>> # of failures more recent than 6 months:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12350869
>>>> 10 failures.
>>>> 
>>>> In the interest of tidying this up and staying on top of it going
>>> forward,
>>>> I propose the following:
>>>> 1. We close as won't fix all test failures created >= 6 months ago (We
>>> had
>>>> a big push for 4.0 and a lot of this JIRA content is stale)
>>>> 2. We switch the "Bug Category" for these 10 more recent to "Correctness
>>> -
>>>> Test Failure"
>>>> 3. We document a "canonical" workflow around test failures that links to
>>> a
>>>> saved JIRA filter query that includes:
>>>> 4. When you're working on something and you see a test failure that isn't
>>>> related to your patch, check that filter, see if the test name is there,
>>>> and if not create a new ticket w/that Bug Category
>>>> 
>>>> In theory this should give us a single source of truth for documented
>>> test
>>>> failures as well as an entry point for new contributors.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> ~Josh
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to