You can raise a PR in any state, but review will be a different matter. I would go ahead and raise it and the testing can be sorted out from there.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:12 PM Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all > > I think I am close to raising a PR now but my CircleCI job > <https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/maulin-vasavada/cassandra> > doesn't make progress beyond key tasks success like unit tests, dtests, > cqlshlibtests. Any recommendation on if we need to see the whole CircleCI > job green before raising the PR? > > Thanks > Maulin > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:54 PM Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I am almost done with all changes except the code snippet in the > > EncryptioOptions.java which determines 'enabled' and 'optional' encryption > > flags. Will raise the PR soon once I see my CircleCI getting green. > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 9:24 AM Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> FYI - I am working on PR. I made some changes and trying to run tests. > >> > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14 PM Maulin Vasavada < > >> maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks Nate for reviewing the CEP. Yes for change #3 in the CEP, I mean > >>> to have only single Default Impl and that would be a final class, not > >>> overridable. It will be basically an internal implementation. I've updated > >>> the CEP to reflect this. > >>> > >>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:21 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Maulin, > >>>> Thanks for putting this together! > >>>> > >>>> Took a quick glance, and I can't think of a compelling reason on why > >>>> SSLContext should be final and your point about organization/compliance > >>>> issues requiring different implementations is a good one. > >>>> > >>>> Per #3 on your proposed changes, I'm keen to only support a single > >>>> default > >>>> impl in-tree. I don't think we should be in the business of picking > >>>> implementation to support. It looks like this is your intention as well? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks again, > >>>> -Nate > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:05 PM Maulin Vasavada < > >>>> maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Hi all > >>>> > > >>>> > Starting a discussion thread for the CIP-9 - > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-9%3A+Make+SSLContext+creation+pluggable > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > However, while writing the CIP two areas that came up in my mind > >>>> where I > >>>> > need to seek guidance apart from the other discussion that we would > >>>> have > >>>> > here, > >>>> > > >>>> > 1. Whether to consider SSLFactory#tlsInstanceProtocolSubstitution() > >>>> > < > >>>> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-4.0/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/security/SSLFactory.java#L169 > >>>> > > > >>>> > for pluggability (noted this on the CIP as well) > >>>> > > >>>> > 2. For Test Plan, apart from Integration Test and local system test > >>>> what > >>>> > would be recommended? > >>>> > > >>>> > Thanks > >>>> > Maulin > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
