> On Jun 30, 2020, at 3:27 PM, David Capwell <dcapw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If that is the case then shouldn't we add MV to "4.0 Quality: Components > and Test Plans" (CASSANDRA-15536)? It is currently missing, so adding it > to the testing road map would be a clear sign that someone is planning to > champion and own this feature; if people feel that this is a broken > feature, shouldn't we have tests showing this? Would be great to see > traction here.
Good point, we should definitely test it to ensure there are no regressions even though it is marked as experimental. I'd also like to clarify that the feature works for a certain subset of use-cases when it is limited to a certain scale. It unfortunately does not scale well with the size of data. I think it is important to call out this distinction. For many users, it's acceptable. For others it is not. Dinesh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
