+1 (nb) on both counts. Thanks for bringing this up!

Jordan

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:53 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
wrote:

> >
> > Maybe put it high up the list, e.g. after Description of Approach?
>
> Really great point. Definitely not the lowest priority item.
>
> I'll leave this thread open for another 24 or 48 for feedback; if
> noncontroversial I'll edit then.
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:45 PM Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me as well, thanks for suggesting.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:54 AM
> > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Discussion: addition to CEP guide
> >
> > Great idea Josh, +1
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:47 AM Benedict Elliott Smith <
> > bened...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1.  This might also serve to produce specific points of discussion
> > around
> > > the topic as the CEP progresses.
> > >
> > > Maybe put it high up the list, e.g. after Description of Approach?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 22/04/2020, 17:40, "Joshua McKenzie" <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Link to CEP guide:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652201
> > >
> > >     Currently the CEP guide reads:
> > >     -------
> > >
> > >     *A CEP should contain the following sections: *
> > >
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Scope,*
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Goals (and non-goals),*
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Description of Approach,*
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Timeline,*
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Mailing list / Slack channels,*
> > >        -
> > >
> > >        *Related JIRA tickets.*
> > >
> > >     ------
> > >     What does everyone think about adding another bullet item as
> follows:
> > >
> > >        - A test plan covering performance, correctness, failure, and
> > > boundary
> > >        conditions (as applicable)
> > >
> > >     ------
> > >     Or some variation thereof. I personally think it's worth calling
> out
> > > "We
> > >     should think about and discuss how we're going to test something
> > from a
> > >     high level collectively before we dive into it", since we've had
> some
> > > pain
> > >     in the past in that area.
> > >
> > >     Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to