> <snip> > My .02: I think it'd improve our ability to collaborate and lower friction > to testing if we could do so on JIRA instead of the cwiki. *I suspect *the > edit access restrictions there plus general UX friction (difficult to have > collab discussion, comment chains, links to things, etc) make the confluent > wiki a worse tool for this job than JIRA. Plus if we do it in JIRA we can > track the outstanding scope in the single board and it's far easier to > visualize everything in one place so we can all know where attention and > resources need to be directed to best move the needle on things. > > But that's just my opinion. What does everyone else think? Like the JIRA > route? Hate it? No opinion? > > If we do decide we want to go the epic / JIRA route, I'd be happy to > migrate the rest of the information in there for things that haven't been > completed yet on the wiki (ticket creation, assignee/reviewer chains, links > to epic). > > So what does everyone think? >
I think this is a good idea. Having the resources available to keep the various bits twiddled correctly on existing and new issues has always been the hard part for us. So regardless of the path, what we really need is some dedicated PM time going forward. Is that something you think you can help resource from your side? (Also, thanks for all the efforts exploring this either way!!)
