+1 Don't have comment rights on the confluence article (or am too dense to figure out _how_ to leave a comment). There's some stringency surrounding clean CI + no flaky tests that I think bear further discussion; for what it's worth I'm 100% in support of having hard gatekeeping so quality doesn't slip, but I've also seen enough proposed cultural changes fail due to being "big bang" vs. incremental that it worries me a touch. Still a +1 as written though.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:07 PM sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release > Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. We have finalized the doc > here[3] Please vote on it if you agree with the content of the doc [3]. > > We did not proceed with the previous vote as we want to use confluence for > it. Here is the link for that[4]. It also mentions why we are doing this > vote. > > Vote will remain open for 72 hours. > > Thanks, > Sankalp > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c610b23f9002978636b66d09f0e0481ed3de9b78895050da22c91c6f@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E > [2] > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit#heading=h.633eppni91tw > [3]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Release+Lifecycle > Attachments area > [4] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/169b00f45dbad295e1aea1da70365fabc8452ef497f78ddfd28c311f@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit?usp=gmail#heading=h.633eppni91tw > > >
