Thanks Sumanth. Let me start another vote

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:26 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti <
sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you, Scott!
> I've moved the document content (along with outstanding comments) into
> cwiki at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Release+Lifecycle.
> Made the GDoc deprecated and view-only, and left breadcrumbs to the cwiki
> in both the jira <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15249>
> as
> well as the GDoc
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit#
> >
> .
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:26 PM Jordan West <jorda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 nb — to both the document and the benefits listed in Scott’s email.
> >
> > Jordan
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 2:26 PM Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > There are two main benefits to agreeing on this:
> > >
> > > 1. Providing clarity for contributors on release phases – i.e., what
> > types
> > > of changes are expected to land or be deferred during a particular
> point
> > in
> > > that cycle.
> > >
> > > 2. Providing semantic clarity to users of Cassandra in terms of what
> they
> > > can expect from a given release.
> > >
> > > The second one is more important. The document stands as a commitment
> > > between the Cassandra project and its users regarding what can be
> > expected
> > > from each type of release. It defines GA releases as "recommended for
> > > production deployment for all users," setting a standard of quality
> that
> > we
> > > aim to uphold together and that users can depend on. Affirming what it
> > > means for a release to be EOL, deprecated, or in maintenance signals
> > > importance of upgrading to a GA version.
> > >
> > > The prerelease phases set expectations for us as contributors to
> produce
> > a
> > > more stable release: what type of testing/validation is needed at what
> > > time, at which point interfaces/protocols solidify, when a release is
> > > considered feature complete, etc.
> > >
> > > Creating clarity for ourselves will help us build a better database,
> and
> > > creating clarity for our users will help give them the confidence to
> run
> > it.
> > >
> > > I want to thank Sumanth for his work on this document and to everyone
> > else
> > > who's contributed.
> > >
> > > I support it (+1 nb).
> > >
> > > – Scott
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Stefan Podkowinski <s...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 1:43 PM
> > > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle
> > >
> > > What exactly will be the implication of the outcome of this vote, in
> > > case the content is agreed upon? What's the proposal of the voting?
> > >
> > > The document seems to be informative rather then formal. It's verbose
> on
> > > definitions that should be commonly understood or can only broadly
> > > defined (what is alpha/beta/RC, GA for production, etc.), while at the
> > > same time is unclear and weasel-wordy on our actual commitment and
> rules.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 30.09.19 20:51, sankalp kohli wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >      We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra
> > > Release
> > > > Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. Please vote on it if you
> > > agree
> > > > with the content of the doc[2].
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sankalp
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c610b23f9002978636b66d09f0e0481ed3de9b78895050da22c91c6f@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit#heading=h.633eppni91tw
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to