Hi Michael,

Thanks for putting very clever information " Users of MVs *must* determine for 
themselves, through 
    thorough testing and understanding, if they wish to use them." And this 
concluded that if there is any issue occur in future then only solution is to 
rebuild the MVs since Cassandra does not able to make consistent synch well.

Also, we practically using the 10+ MVs and as of now, we have not faced any 
issue, so my question to all community member, does anyone face any critical 
issues ? so we need to start migration from MVs to manual query base table ? 

Also, I can understand now, it's experimental and not ready for production, so 
if possible, please ignore it only right ?

Thanks 
Pankaj 

On 27/08/19, 19:03, "Michael Shuler" <mshu...@pbandjelly.org on behalf of 
mich...@pbandjelly.org> wrote:

    It appears that you found the first message of the chain. I suggest 
    reading the linked JIRA and the complete dev@ thread that arrived at 
    this conclusion; there are loads of well formed opinions and 
    information. Users of MVs *must* determine for themselves, through 
    thorough testing and understanding, if they wish to use them.
    
    Linkage:
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13959
      (sub-linkage..)
      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13595
      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13911
      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13880
      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12872
      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13747
    
    Very much worth reading the complete thread:
    part1: 
    
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d81a61da48e1b872d7599df4edfa8e244d34cbd591a18539f724796f@<dev.cassandra.apache.org>
    part2: 
    
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19b7fcfd3b47f1526d6e993b3bb97f6c43e5ce204bc976ec0701cdd3@<dev.cassandra.apache.org>
    
    Quick JQL for open tickets with "mv":
    
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20text%20~%20mv%20AND%20status%20!%3D%20Resolved
    
    -- 
    Michael
    
    On 8/27/19 5:01 AM, pankaj gajjar wrote:
    > Hello,
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > concern about Materialized Views (MVs) in Cassandra. Unfortunately 
starting
    > with version 3.11, MVs are officially considered experimental and not 
ready
    > for production use, as you can read here:
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cassandra-user/201710.mbox/%3cetpan.59f24f38.438f4e99.7...@apple.com%3E
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Can you please someone give some productive feedback on this ? it would
    > help us to further implementation around the MVs in Cassandra.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Does anyone facing some critical issue or data lose or synchronization
    > issue ?
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Regards
    > 
    > Pankaj.
    > 
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
    
    

Reply via email to