+0.5 I skimmed the jira and github diff and a few things came to mind: - There are multiple comments about using an older jar than the latest version. - I did not see any performance test results to form an opinion on any gains/caveats as a user. This was the first thing I looked for. - I did not see any conf/cassandra.yaml comment in the diff for the valid class_name configuration option to use.
Seems interesting, and there are comments about 4.0 being in a freeze and all, but OK on it being non-default. -- Michael On 2/15/19 11:43 AM, Ariel Weisberg wrote: > Hi, > > I am +1 since it's an additional compressor and not the default. > > Ariel > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd support. >> The consensus on the ticket was that it’s a very valuable addition >> without any risk of destabilizing 4.0. It’s ready to go if there aren’t >> any objections. >> >> Dinesh >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
