On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:42 PM kurt greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> wrote:
> Been thinking about this for a while and agree it's how we should approach > it. BIkeshedding but seems like a nice big table would be suitable here, > and I think rather than a separate confluence page per component we just > create separate JIRA tickets that detail what's being tested and the > approach, and discussion can be kept in JIRA. > Can we let each component group figure out how they want to do project management with the one caveat that they list the component on the page and have a tracking ticket with the right label? I think that's the lightest touch process that will work. > I'm happy to volunteer for testing repair. I can also add lots of different > components to the list if you're happy for me to attack the page. > Go for it! I just jotted down some seed topics to get it started. Please do edit and refactor to make it better. -Joey
