SOrry to spam this with two messages...

This ticket is also interesting because it is very close to what I imagined
a useful use case of RF4 / RF6: being basically RF3 + hot spare where you
marked (in the case of RF4) three nodes as primary and the fourth as hot
standby, which may be equivalent if I understand the paper/protocol to
RF3+1 transient.

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:07 PM Carl Mueller <carl.muel...@smartthings.com>
wrote:

> I put these questions on the ticket too... Sorry if some of them are
> stupid.
>
> So are (basically) these transient nodes basically serving as centralized
> hinted handoff caches rather than having the hinted handoffs cluttering up
> full replicas, especially nodes that have no concern for the token range
> involved? I understand that hinted handoffs aren't being replaced by this,
> but is that kind of the idea?
>
> Are the transient nodes "sitting around"?
>
> Will the transient nodes have cheaper/lower hardware requirements?
>
> During cluster expansion, does the newly streaming node acquiring data
> function as a temporary transient node until it becomes a full replica?
> Likewise while shrinking, does a previously full replica function as a
> transient while it streams off data?
>
> Can this help vnode expansion with multiple concurrent nodes? Admittedly
> I'm not familiar with how much work has gone into fixing cluster expansion
> with vnodes, it is my understanding that you typically expand only one node
> at a time or in multiples of the datacenter size
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:29 PM Ariel Weisberg <ar...@weisberg.ws> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wanted to give everyone an update on how development of Transient
>> Replication is going and where we are going to be as of 9/1. Blake
>> Eggleston, Alex Petrov, Benedict Elliott Smith, and myself have been
>> working to get TR implemented for 4.0. Up to now we have avoided merging
>> anything related to TR to trunk because we weren't 100% sure we were going
>> to make the 9/1 deadline and even minimal TR functionality requires
>> significant changes (see 14405).
>>
>> We focused on getting a minimal set of deployable functionality working,
>> and want to avoid overselling what's going to work in the first version.
>> The feature is marked explicitly as experimental and has to be enabled via
>> a feature flag in cassandra.yaml. The expected audience for TR in 4.0 is
>> more experienced users who are ready to tackle deploying experimental
>> functionality. As it is deployed by experienced users and we gain more
>> confidence in it and remove caveats the # of users it will be appropriate
>> for will expand.
>>
>> For 4.0 it looks like we will be able to merge TR with support for normal
>> reads and writes without monotonic reads. Monotonic reads require blocking
>> read repair and blocking read repair with TR requires further changes that
>> aren't feasible by 9/1.
>>
>> Future TR support would look something like
>>
>> 4.0.next:
>>     * vnodes (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14404)
>>
>> 4.next:
>>     * Monotonic reads (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14665)
>>     * LWT (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14547)
>>     * Batch log (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14549)
>>     * Counters (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14548)
>>
>> Possibly never:
>>     * Materialized views
>>
>> Probably never:
>>     * Secondary indexes
>>
>> The most difficult changes to support Transient Replication should be
>> behind us. LWT, Batch log, and counters shouldn't be that hard to make
>> transient replication aware. Monotonic reads require some changes to the
>> read path, but are at least conceptually not that hard to support. I am
>> confident that by 4.next TR will have fewer tradeoffs.
>>
>> If you want to take a peek the current feature branch is
>> https://github.com/aweisberg/cassandra/tree/14409-7 although we will be
>> moving to 14409-8 to rebase on to trunk.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ariel
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to