> On Jul 10, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > > I guess I look at the initial voting in of committers as the process > by which people are trusted to merge things in. This proposed process > revokes that trust. If Jonathan Ellis or Dave Brosius (arbitrarily > picked) wants to merge a new feature into trunk during the freeze, now > they're not allowed? That's absurd. People have already met the bar > and have been voted in by merit, they should not have their privilege > revoked.
Is it so bad to leave features in branches for a bit longer while we try to get a stable release out? The proposal is for committers to hold off committing features into trunk while we test and stabilize it. Why don’t we give it a try and see if it works? If we fail to get consensus, we have failed even without trying something new. What is worse? Dinesh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
