Ariel,

>> Option 4, upgrade trunk, update NEWS.TXT in prior versions warning about
the vulnerability

+1 to this. I'll check the ticket, as well.

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Ariel Weisberg <ar...@weisberg.ws> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Option 4, upgrade trunk, update NEWS.TXT in prior versions warning about
> the vulnerability.
>
> Ariel
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Ariel Weisberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So our options are:
> >
> > 1. Ignore it.
> > Most people aren't using this functionality.
> > Most people aren't and shouldn't be exposing the logging port to
> > untrusted networks
> > But everyone loses at defense in depth (or is it breadth) if they use
> > this functionality and someone might expose the port
> >
> > 2. Remove the offending classes from the 1.1.10 jar
> > My crazy idea, break it, but only for the people using the vulnerable
> > functionality. Possibly no one, but probably someone. Maybe they can
> > upgrade it manually for their usage?
> > This also has an issue when working with maven.
> >
> > 3. Upgrade it
> > Definitely going to break some apps according to Michael Shuler.
> > Happened when he tried it.
> >
> > Certainly we can upgrade in trunk? While we are at it come up to the
> > latest version.
> >
> > Ariel
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Ariel Weisberg wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't think the fix is in 1.1.11 looking at the diff between 1.1.11
> > > and 1.2.0 https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/compare/v_1.1.11...v_1.2.0
> > >
> > > I looked at 1.1.11 and 1.1.10 and didn't see it there either.
> > >
> > > When you say stuff broke do you mean stuff not in the dtests or utests?
> > >
> > > Ariel
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > > > I tried a logback 1.2.x jar update a number of months ago to fix the
> > > > broken log rotation (try setting rotation to a large number - you'll
> > > > find you only get I think it was 10 files, regardless of setting).
> > > >
> > > > Like we've found updating other jars in the past, this seemingly
> > > > "simple" update broke a number of application components, so we
> rolled
> > > > it back and worked out another log rotation method.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the logback changelog, I cannot tell if version 1.1.11 is
> > > > fixed for this, or if that might be less breakage? There are a pretty
> > > > significant number of API-looking changes from 1.1.3 to 1.2.3, so I
> do
> > > > not wish to break other user's applications, as I have experienced.
> > > >
> > > > I do not think this should block the current releases, unless someone
> > > > wants to do some significant testing and user outreach for
> tentatively
> > > > breaking their applications.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On 02/13/2018 10:48 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> > > > > Ariel,
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is a legit CVE, then we would want to patch all the current
> > > > > versions we support - which is 2.1 and higher.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, is this worth stopping the current open vote for this patch?
> (Not in
> > > > > a place to look at the patch and affects to impacted branches
> right now).
> > > > >
> > > > > Jason
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:43 Ariel Weisberg <ar...@weisberg.ws>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Seems like users could conceivably be using the vulnerable
> component. Also
> > > > >> seems like like we need potentially need to do this as far back
> as 2.1?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Anyone else have an opinion before I commit this? What version to
> start
> > > > >> from?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ariel
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 5:59 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> > > > >>> Hi dev team,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Sorry to keep bothering you.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This is just a friendly reminder that I would like to contribute
> to this
> > > > >>> project starting with a fix for CASSANDRA-14183
> > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14183>.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> []s,
> > > > >>> Thiago.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thi...@veronezi.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hi dev team,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Can one of you guys take a look on this jira ticket?
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14183
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> It has an a patch available for a known security issue with one
> of the
> > > > >>>> dependencies. It has only with trivial code changes. It should
> be
> > > > >>>> straightforward to review it. Any feedback is very welcome.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Thiago
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to